Skip to main content

5. Usage analytics: How do we count quota consumption?

Learn how the Verify Portal calculates usage.

S
Written by Sara Elashi

How is consumption calculated?

Meridia Verify processes geospatial supply chain data. For that reason, usage and quota consumption are measured on a hectare basis, which is the most appropriate and widely used unit for geospatial analysis.

Hectares also serve as a practical proxy for associated sourcing volumes and, by extension, compliance and verification effort. This allows quota allocation and budgeting to scale in line with the real analytical workload performed by the platform.

Logic behind quota consumption calculation

Quota consumption is calculated based on the spatial footprint of the data processed:

  • Polygons are always measured using their calculated geometric area within the platform, regardless of any reported or declared size. This ensures consistent, objective measurement across all datasets.

  • Geopoints rely on a reported plot size where available. If no size is provided, Meridia Verify applies predefined default hectare values to ensure the data can still be processed.

Commodity

Value

Definition

Coffee

2 Ha

commodity_estimated_area

Palm Oil

2 Ha

commodity_estimated_area

Cocoa

2 Ha

commodity_estimated_area

Soy

200 Ha

commodity_estimated_area

Other

4 Ha

estimated_area

Quota Consumption Rules for Data Reprocessing

To avoid penalising customers for operational workflows that require resubmission or correction of data, Meridia Verify tracks consumption based on unique spatial data only.

From 1 June 2026 00:00:00 UTC, a unique plot is defined by two dimensions:

Dimension

Role

Geometry

Primary uniqueness anchor. Plots with identical geometries submitted within the same billing cycle are treated as duplicates, regardless of farm plot ID.

Profile

Secondary dimension. The same geometry run against different verification profiles (e.g. EUDR, DCF, Data Quality) counts as a separate billable unit per profile.

Farm plot ID is no longer a factor in duplicate detection or quota consumption.

Note

This logic applies to all uploads from 1 June 2026 00:00:00 UTC onwards. Historical consumption prior to this date is not recalculated.

Usage calculation cases:

Case 01: Change to geometry (with or without a change to farm plot ID)

Any modification to a plot’s geometry — including a single coordinate or decimal place — causes the plot to be treated as a new, unique feature and counted towards consumption.

Example 1.1: A single farm polygon is split into two plots. Although one plot retains the original ID ‘P-12334’, its geometry has changed, and a second plot with a new geometry and new ID ‘P-12335’ has been created. Both plots are recognised as new unique features and counted separately.

Example 1.2: A polygon’s geometry is corrected to resolve an overlap and reflect accurate farm boundaries. Even though the farm plot ID is unchanged, the updated geometry is treated as new and reprocessed accordingly.

Example 1.3: Any change to a geometry, including an empty Z coordinate being added or corrected, is treated as new geometry and incurs consumption.


Case 02: Change to farm plot ID with unchanged geometry → no additional charge

From 1 June 2026 00:00:00 UTC, if a plot is resubmitted with a different farm plot ID but the same geometry, it is recognised as a duplicate and does not count towards quota consumption.

This covers common scenarios including:

  • Anonymised IDs rotated between upload cycles

  • Identifiers changed during a system migration

  • The same physical plot submitted via GeoJSON and Excel with different IDs

Example 2.1: A plot previously submitted as ‘P-12334’ is resubmitted as ‘ABC-76896’. The geometry is identical. The system recognises this as the same physical plot and does not bill again.

Example 2.2: A geopoint is resubmitted with the same coordinates but a differently formatted farm plot ID. The system treats this as a duplicate and does not consume additional quota.


Case 03: Same geometry, multiple verification profiles → billed per profile

Running the same plot geometry against different verification profiles counts as a separate billable unit per profile.

Example 3.1: A plot is run against EUDR and DCF. This counts as two consumption units.

Example 3.2: A plot is run against EUDR, DCF, and Data Quality. This counts as three consumption units.

Example 3.3: A plot is run against the same profile twice within the same billing cycle. This counts as one consumption unit — the second run is treated as a duplicate.

Exceptions

Changes to non-geometric attributes — including farmer ID, mapping date, farmer name, and aggregator ID — are not taken into account for consumption purposes. Reprocessing the same underlying plot with only these attributes changed will not consume additional quota.


Summary

From 1 June 2026 00:00:00 UTC, Meridia Verify determines quota consumption based on unique spatial data, using geometry and verification profile as the key dimensions for uniqueness.

This ensures customers are charged only for genuinely new analytical work, not for duplicate submissions, ID changes, or non-spatial corrections.

A plot is considered unique based on the following rules:

Same geometry, different farm plot ID → duplicate, not billed

If the same physical plot is resubmitted with identical geometry but a different farm plot ID, it is treated as a duplicate and does not consume additional quota.

Farm plot ID is no longer used for duplicate detection.

Same geometry, same profile, resubmitted → duplicate, not billed

If the same geometry is submitted again within the same billing cycle and processed under the same verification profile, it is treated as a duplicate.

Only the first submission consumes quota.

Same geometry, different profile → new billable unit per profile

If the same geometry is processed under different verification profiles, each profile counts as a separate billable unit.

For example, EUDR + DCF = 2 consumption units, while EUDR + DCF + Data Quality = 3 consumption units.

Changed geometry → new billable unit, regardless of farm plot ID

Any change to geometry makes the plot a new unique feature, even if the farm plot ID stays the same.

This includes boundary edits, coordinate adjustments, polygon splits, overlap corrections, or technical geometry changes such as adding or modifying an empty Z coordinate.

Non-geometric attribute changes do not affect consumption

Changes to farmer ID, farmer name, aggregator ID, mapping date, or similar descriptive fields do not consume additional quota.

As long as the geometry and verification profile remain the same, the plot is treated as a duplicate.

Area-based consumption remains unchanged

Quota consumption continues to be measured in hectares, based on the spatial footprint processed by Meridia Verify.

Polygons use the calculated geometric area. Geopoints use the reported plot size where available, or default hectare values if no size is provided.

Historical data is not recalculated

This logic applies only to uploads from 1 June 2026 00:00:00 UTC onwards. Historical consumption before this date is not recalculated or adjusted retroactively.

Did this answer your question?